Trust scored specifically, not folded into a generic score

Does your site give visitors a reason to actually trust you?

Every visitor is silently weighing risk against benefit before they buy or enquire. Paste your URL and find out whether your site is doing anything to reduce that risk.

Free · 60 seconds · No signup · Scored across 10 commercial dimensions
Why this matters

Every visitor is silently running a risk calculation, whether they realise it or not

Before any purchase or enquiry, a visitor is weighing expected benefit against perceived risk, almost always unconsciously. Trust signals work by directly reducing that perceived risk — and a page can be beautifully designed and still fail to convert if nothing on it actually addresses that quiet, background calculation.

This is why specificity matters more than most site owners assume. 'Trusted by many' is easy for a visitor to mentally discount, because it asks them to simply take your word for it. A specific number, a named person, or a verifiable credential does real work precisely because it's checkable, even if the visitor never actually checks it.

Placement matters just as much as content. A trust signal buried in the footer does no work at the actual moment of decision — the same content, placed directly beside the relevant call-to-action, measurably changes behaviour, because it addresses hesitation exactly when and where it arises.

The three areas below are where trust most commonly gets lost — either missing entirely, or present but not doing any real work.

What trust signals actually do

Where trust gets built, and where it quietly leaks away

🗣️ Vague social proof
"Trusted by many" does no persuasive work. A specific number, or a named quote with a role, is what actually reduces hesitation.
🔒 No visible guarantee or policy
An unstated return policy or unclear guarantee leaves a visitor to assume the worst-case scenario by default.
👤 Anonymity where a name would help
A business with no visible people behind it — no team photos, no named founder — reads as less accountable, even when the underlying business is entirely legitimate.
Common questions

Website Trust Audit — FAQ

What counts as a 'trust signal' exactly?

Anything specific and verifiable that reduces a visitor's perceived risk — a named testimonial with a role, a specific number, a visible guarantee, or a professional credential. Vague claims of quality generally don't count.

Do I need real customer reviews for this to work?

Reviews help, but trust signals extend beyond reviews — credentials, specific guarantees, and named team members all contribute, even for a business that doesn't yet have a large review volume.

Can too many trust signals hurt a page?

A wall of trust signals concentrated in one section does less work than the same content distributed to where it's actually relevant — spreading signals to the specific moments they address tends to perform better than clustering them.

Is trust the same as professionalism?

Related but distinct — a professional-looking site without specific, verifiable proof can still leave a visitor's underlying risk calculation unaddressed, even if the design itself looks polished.

Go deeper

Related reading

What Actually Counts as a Trust Signal Where to Place Trust Signals for Maximum Effect Specific vs Vague Social Proof: Why It Matters

Want the fixes implemented, not just listed?

The SiteMedic team can implement every recommendation directly.

Get it fixed →