Most visitors are on mobile, but most sites are still designed and tested on desktop first. Paste your URL and find out what that gap is actually costing you.
For a large share of businesses, mobile is no longer a secondary experience to be adapted from a 'real' desktop site — it's the primary, and sometimes only, way most visitors ever encounter the business at all. Treating mobile as an afterthought means treating the majority experience as an afterthought.
This is why testing on your own device gives a false sense of security. Your own phone, your own familiar connection, and your own knowledge of how the site is meant to work all hide problems that a genuine first-time visitor, on an unfamiliar device with a slower connection, would hit immediately.
It's also worth naming the specific, repeatable mistakes that account for most mobile problems: layouts that were shrunk rather than genuinely rebuilt for a narrow screen, tap targets sized for a mouse cursor rather than a fingertip, and calls-to-action pushed below the fold by content that was fine on a wider desktop layout.
The three areas below are where mobile experience most commonly breaks down.
Not fully — your own device, connection, and familiarity with the site all hide problems that a genuine first-time visitor, on a different device or slower connection, would encounter immediately.
Not necessarily. 'Mobile-friendly' often means a desktop layout that technically resizes; 'mobile-first' means the experience was actually designed for a narrow screen first, which typically performs better.
The audit evaluates structural and content patterns that affect mobile experience broadly, rather than testing every individual device and screen size combination.
Mobile is one of 10 scored dimensions, evaluated alongside clarity, trust, and conversion — a mobile-optimised site with an unclear message still won't score perfectly on its own.
The SiteMedic team can implement every recommendation directly.
Get it fixed →