Financial advice is one of the highest-trust decisions a website can ask for. Paste your URL and find out if it earns that trust.
Financial advice is one of the few services where a visitor is being asked to trust someone with their actual long-term financial security — not just a one-off purchase, but an ongoing relationship involving real vulnerability. That changes the entire calculus of what a website needs to establish before a visitor will even consider a first conversation.
Unlike most other professional services, generic credibility signals do very little here. What actually matters is specific, verifiable regulatory standing — because without it, a rational visitor has no way to distinguish a legitimate adviser from someone who simply built a professional-looking website.
This is also why the enquiry step itself needs unusual care. Many visitors are hesitant to share financial details with an unfamiliar adviser, and a site that jumps straight to a detailed contact form, without first offering a lower-commitment first step, loses visitors who would have engaged given a gentler entry point.
The three issues below are the ones most commonly leaving that regulatory trust or entry-point hesitation unaddressed.
No — it checks whether registration and regulatory standing are clearly and visibly stated on the site. It doesn't independently verify status against a regulatory body's database.
Yes, if no indication of fee structure (fee-only, commission-based, or hybrid) is present, since this is a common and specific trust question for this industry.
Yes. It evaluates clarity of positioning around your actual specialism rather than assuming broad, generalist financial advice.
It weights regulatory trust signals and low-commitment first-step framing more heavily, since financial advice carries a specific combination of regulatory sensitivity and personal financial vulnerability.
The SiteMedic team can implement every recommendation for you. Send us your results and we'll quote the fix.
Get it fixed →