Financial advice is one of the highest-trust decisions a website can ask for. Regulatory legitimacy has to be visible, not assumed.
Financial advice is one of the highest-trust decisions a website can ask for. Regulatory legitimacy has to be visible, not assumed — a visitor evaluating who manages their retirement savings is, reasonably, in active verification mode.
FCA registration (or the local equivalent) and a registration number should be stated plainly, not implied. This is one of the first things a cautious visitor checks, and its visibility is itself a trust signal independent of the number itself.
Financial advice is deeply personal — a visitor wants to know who specifically will be advising them, what they're qualified in, and whether they specialise in something relevant (retirement, business protection, mortgages).
Fee-only, commission-based, or hybrid — stating the model plainly addresses a specific, common source of distrust in this industry, where fee opacity has historically been a real reputational problem across the sector.
Whether advice is independent (whole-of-market) or restricted (tied to specific products) materially changes what a visitor should expect, and stating this plainly — rather than leaving it ambiguous — builds credibility precisely because many firms don't.
Financial services regulation limits what can be claimed about results, but describing the type of client typically helped and the type of problem typically solved, within compliance bounds, still does real trust-building work.
Find out which trust signals your site is missing.
Run a free audit →