Vehicle listings are naturally photo-heavy, and buyers compare multiple dealers before ever calling. Paste your URL and find out where you're losing that comparison.
A buyer researching a car purchase is almost always comparing multiple dealerships simultaneously, often with several tabs open at once. No single dealership website wins that comparison through persuasion alone — the more realistic goal is simply not losing the buyer to friction before the comparison is even fair.
This reframes what actually matters. A slow-loading listing page doesn't just look worse than a competitor's — it actively removes you from consideration before the buyer has even properly evaluated the vehicle, because they'll simply close the tab and move to whichever page loaded first.
Financing is the other quiet decider. Many buyers think in monthly payment terms rather than total price, and a listing that doesn't frame cost that way forces the buyer to do the math themselves — extra friction that a faster-loading, clearer competitor listing doesn't require.
The three issues below are the ones most commonly losing that comparison before it's even a fair fight.
It evaluates general site performance and image optimisation patterns that typically affect listing pages, rather than testing every individual listing's load time separately.
Yes, if no financing or trade-in information is present at all, since this is frequently a deciding factor independent of the vehicle itself.
Yes. It evaluates clarity and trust signals appropriate to your actual inventory type, rather than assuming a specific dealership model.
It weights image-heavy page performance and financing clarity more heavily, since vehicle listings are unusually photo-dense and financing terms matter more here than in typical retail.
The SiteMedic team can implement every recommendation for you. Send us your results and we'll quote the fix.
Get it fixed →